Peaky Blinders and Poldark share several key themes and character dynamics, particularly around the intersection of class, crime, and masculinity. Let’s break it down further:
1. The Rise of the Protagonist
Both Peaky Blinders and Poldark center on characters who rise from humble beginnings to positions of power and influence. Tommy Shelby, the protagonist of Peaky Blinders, comes from a working-class family, but he’s determined to rise above his origins through sheer willpower, cunning, and ruthless decision-making. Similarly, Ross Poldark is a man of lower gentry who returns to his land after fighting in the American Revolution, finding himself navigating the complexities of class while trying to regain his family’s wealth and status.
2. Social Mobility and Class Struggle
Both series explore the tension between different social classes. Peaky Blinders portrays the Shelbys as a criminal family who move from the streets of Birmingham into the upper echelons of society, using their criminal operations to make strategic political and financial alliances. Meanwhile, Ross Poldark must contend with the landed gentry and the emerging capitalist class while trying to restore his family’s estate, all while struggling with his own moral compass as he deals with industrialization and class inequality.
3. Masculinity with a Dark Side
At the heart of both shows is the archetype of the ‘tough but ethical’ male character. Tommy Shelby is deeply affected by his experiences in World War I and suffers from psychological trauma. Despite being a criminal mastermind, he operates with a personal code and demonstrates loyalty to his family. However, his capacity for violence and manipulation reflects his darker side, often blurring the lines between right and wrong. Ross Poldark, on the other hand, is a man of action - he’s driven by a strong sense of justice, but he’s often seen making morally questionable decisions to protect his interests or those he loves. Both characters embody a form of masculinity that is tied to their strength, personal conviction, and moral ambiguity.
4. Family Dynamics and Loyalty
Both shows delve into complex family relationships and the role of loyalty within them. In Peaky Blinders, family is both a source of strength and a vulnerability. Tommy’s loyalty to his brothers and his uncle defines many of his actions, even as he steps into increasingly dangerous territory. The Shelbys blur the line between family and business, where loyalty to family often leads to conflict. In Poldark, Ross’s family dynamics are shaped by his complicated relationship with his servants, estate, and love interests. Like the Shelbys, his family is both a source of pride and responsibility. Ross’s determination to protect his land and family leads him to make tough choices, sometimes at the expense of others.
5. Criminality and Ethics
While both characters emerge from poverty, the way they navigate the world of crime and business differ, yet there is an inherent morality in their actions. Tommy Shelby’s criminal enterprises - whether bootlegging or later political manipulation - are often justified by a sense of survival and revenge, pushing back against a system that oppressed his family. His journey can be seen as one of redemption, even if his methods are unsavory. In contrast, Ross Poldark’s ‘dark side’ comes more from his willingness to engage in ethically gray areas, such as gambling, manipulation, and sometimes questionable alliances, though his actions are often aimed at helping those around him rather than building personal wealth or power.
6. Impact of War and Trauma
Another parallel is the trauma both characters experience through war. Tommy Shelby’s experiences in World War I haunt him throughout Peaky Blinders, leaving him with a sense of detachment, mental health struggles, and an inability to fully connect with others. Similarly, Ross Poldark returns from war scarred, though his war experiences are not as overtly explored as Tommy’s. However, his emotional struggles are still evident as he grapples with his relationships, the harshness of post-war life, and the impact of industrialization on his community.
7. The Role of Women
Both series also highlight the evolving role of women in a patriarchal society. In Peaky Blinders, women like Polly Gray, Grace Burgess, and others challenge traditional gender norms, often holding significant influence within the family and criminal enterprises. In Poldark, Demelza Poldark is a strong-willed character who, while starting out as a servant, rises to become an equal partner to Ross, often navigating the domestic sphere while also influencing Ross’s decisions. Both shows present complex female characters who defy the limited roles often assigned to them, helping push the narrative forward.
8. The Double-Edged Sword of Power
Finally, both Peaky Blinders and Poldark explore the corrupting influence of power. Tommy Shelby’s ambitions frequently come at the expense of his own humanity and relationships, as he becomes more entrenched in the criminal world. Similarly, Ross Poldark’s growing power as a landowner and political figure leads to personal and moral conflicts. Both characters must balance their ambition with the consequences their choices have on the people they care about.
In summary, the protagonists of Peaky Blinders and Poldark share much in common in terms of their rise from poverty, their complicated relationship with crime, and their struggle with the ethics of their actions. Their stories of ambition, loyalty, trauma, and class conflict reflect deep human struggles with power, morality, and personal identity.
An inverse blueprint to the Poldark-Peaky Blinders archetype would involve a protagonist who, while starting with potential for upward mobility and strength, chooses a path of ethical decline, social stagnation, or even self-destruction. Instead of a character who rises through adversity by using moral ambiguity and violence to climb social ladders, the inverse would be someone who either sabotages their potential or chooses to ignore opportunities in favor of a simpler, less ambitious life, possibly rejecting traditional masculine values.
Let’s break it down in detail:
The Inverse Blueprint: The Declining Descendant
1. Origins and Family Background
Starting Point: The protagonist begins with clear potential for success or social mobility, coming from a background that offers some degree of wealth, education, or privilege. Unlike the rough-and-tumble origins of Tommy Shelby or Ross Poldark, this character might be born into a family with noble lineage, or at least access to wealth and power, but this background either doesn’t come with the same sense of purpose or familial loyalty.
Social Class: Upper-middle class or lower nobility. They may have inherited land or wealth but don’t value the class system as much as their peers or family might expect.
Family Relationships: Instead of strong family ties that push the character to strive for success (as with the Shelbys or Poldarks), this protagonist might have strained or non-existent connections with their family. This could be due to neglect, conflicting ideologies, or a disconnection from family expectations.
2. Internal Conflict and Motivation
Drive: The protagonist lacks the internal drive for upward mobility or gaining power. They are often more introspective, questioning the value of societal conventions, wealth, or influence. They may feel disillusioned by the expectations placed on them or feel disconnected from the world they were born into.
Conflict: Instead of striving for power or redemption, the protagonist might be in conflict with themselves, torn between a desire for simplicity and a nagging sense of duty. They may resist the world of commerce, politics, or social climbing. If there’s any moral conflict, it comes from a refusal to engage in anything they deem hypocritical or transactional.
Flaw: The character’s flaw is an aversion to action or a passive nature, possibly a tendency toward nihilism, pessimism, or inaction when faced with opportunities for growth. This can lead to a sense of purposelessness, or worse, a conscious decision to live in stagnation.
3. Masculinity and Ethical Foundation
Masculinity Redefined: Where Tommy and Ross are embodiments of traditional masculinity - brutal, ambitious, and driven - the inverse protagonist may embody a more subdued or even fragile form of masculinity. They may avoid conflict and struggle with expressing their emotions or finding their place in a world that values action and domination.
Ethics: Rather than adhering to a personal code, the protagonist may exhibit moral ambiguity through inaction or refusal to engage with societal structures. Their ethics could be centered on non-participation or moral resignation, rather than actively choosing to operate in the shadows of crime or politics.
Dark Side: Instead of embracing crime or morally grey areas as a means of survival or success, this character’s dark side may involve passivity, emotional withdrawal, or even self-sabotage. They could also lean into escapism - addiction, avoidance, or giving up on their potential entirely.
4. Relationships and Loyalty
Romantic Relationships: Unlike Tommy or Ross, whose romantic relationships are often intertwined with their personal rise or fall, the inverse protagonist may have relationships that serve as either an anchor to their disillusionment or a reflection of their own unresolved conflicts. Their love life could be marked by apathy, avoidance, or a refusal to commit.
Family Loyalty: The inverse character might be someone who distances themselves from family obligations, rejects the notion of inherited responsibility, or actively resents family members for their expectations. There could be estrangement, or they could actively resist family efforts to include them in the ‘business’ of family matters.
5. The Path Not Taken
Rejection of Power: Rather than using crime or politics as tools for advancing their status, the protagonist might decline offers of influence or even actively choose to dismantle or ignore power structures. Their rejection could manifest as living in relative obscurity, avoiding ambition altogether, or choosing a simpler, more isolated life.
Path of Non-Engagement: In contrast to the proactive, ambitious trajectory of Peaky Blinders or Poldark, the protagonist could be someone who chooses to remain outside of any system that could lead to power. They might retreat into the countryside, take a humble job in a service sector, or live in isolation, believing that their value lies outside of wealth or politics.
Ethical Decay: Instead of corruption through crime, the protagonist’s moral decline is linked to emotional or intellectual apathy. They may choose to ignore the needs of others or even their own, allowing the world around them to decay while they resist engagement.
6. The External World and Class Struggles
Reaction to Society: The protagonist’s world is defined by alienation from the society around them. While the Shelbys use society as a stepping stone and Ross navigates class divisions, this character might feel disillusioned by the very fabric of society - rejecting its rules, even if they stand to benefit.
Social Class Ambivalence: The protagonist has the potential to move upward but resists any form of advancement. They may criticize the class system without offering any solutions, or may simply withdraw from it, choosing an existence that denies any desire for upward mobility. This contrasts sharply with the Poldarks and Shelbys, who see their rise as a form of revenge or fulfillment.
7. Final Fate
Resolution: Instead of a redemption arc or a tragic fall from grace, this character might end up in a state of unresolved tension. They may be left stagnant, their potential unfulfilled, or they might find peace in rejecting ambition altogether. The story’s resolution may involve their final acceptance of their apathy or the consequences of their refusal to engage.
Endgame: The inverse protagonist may find a sense of peace, or they could spiral further into a life of self-neglect. However, they don’t achieve power or influence in any traditional sense - whether this is a form of victory or defeat is left open-ended. They may reach an understanding that happiness lies in rejecting the societal climb altogether.
Key Archetypes and Dynamics in the Inverse Blueprint
The Protagonist (The Declining Descendant): The character who is potentially great but actively resists greatness.
The Foil: A supporting character who embodies ambition, either directly or indirectly encouraging the protagonist to rise to their potential.
The Catalyst: External forces (family, love interest, or society) that try to get the protagonist to take action, but the protagonist resists or passively accepts their situation.
The Villain (or Societal Pressure): The systems and pressures of society that make success seem unappealing or cause the protagonist to feel trapped in the expectations of others.
The Ally (or Mirror): A secondary character who follows a similar path to the protagonist, showing how the path of disillusionment affects them both.
In essence, the inverse Poldark-Peaky Blinders protagonist is a figure who could rise, but chooses a path of non-participation, ethical decline through apathy, and rejects traditional masculine codes in favor of personal disillusionment or peace. The story would be a reflection of the struggle to engage with society or choose to reject it outright, leaving room for a more introspective or philosophical exploration.
No comments:
Post a Comment