1. A Detailed Explanation of L’objet Petit a (Objet Petit a)
Jacques Lacan’s concept of l’objet petit a (often written as objet a or simply a) is one of the most enigmatic and central ideas in his psychoanalytic theory, emerging prominently in his seminars from the 1950s onward, particularly Seminar XI: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis (1964). It translates roughly to “the object little a,” where the lowercase “a” evokes its status as a placeholder or remnant—something fragmentary and elusive, not a full-fledged “object” in the everyday sense. Lacan introduces it as the object-cause of desire, the elusive “thing” that propels human longing without ever satisfying it. It’s not what we want per se, but what causes our wanting, a perpetual engine of dissatisfaction that structures subjectivity itself.
To unpack this:
• The Role of Lack and the Real: Lacan posits that human desire arises from a primordial lack (manque), originating in the “Real”—the unmediated, pre-symbolic dimension of existence before language and the social order intervene. During the “mirror stage” (around 6-18 months), the infant encounters its fragmented body in the mirror, constructing an illusory wholeness via the image of the “little other” (petit autre, symbolized as a). This “little other” is the specular ego-ideal: the narcissistic reflection we mistake for completeness. But this wholeness is a fantasy; the Real is always lost, leaving behind objet a as its leftover, a “substantial void” or “reified emptiness.” It’s the cause of desire because it reminds us of that initial loss—we chase it to fill the gap, but it’s inherently unattainable.
• Not the Object of Desire, But Its Cause: Crucially, objet a isn’t the object we desire (e.g., a lover, money, power). Lacan distinguishes it from the “big Other” (grand Autre, the symbolic order of language, law, and society, which demands we desire what it desires). Instead, objet a is the cause—the partial, surplus element that slips through the symbolic net. It’s what makes desire metonymic (endlessly deferred, sliding from one object to another) and metaphoric (disguised in fantasies). As Lacan puts it, “Desire is the desire of the Other,” but objet a is the “unsayable” kernel, the “impossible thing” that women (or anyone) truly desire in the video you referenced—a forbidden, phallic lack that no acquisition can resolve.
• Partial Objects and Examples: Lacan illustrates objet a through “partial objects” tied to the drives (oral, anal, scopic, invocatory). These aren’t whole things but fragments:
• The Gaze (le regard): Not what we see, but the feeling of being seen—e.g., the anxiety of an unseen eye watching us, evoking vulnerability.
• The Voice: A disembodied sound (a moan, a command) that captivates beyond words.
• The Breast: The oral remnant of the mother’s body, forever partial. These are “positive negativities”: voids masquerading as treasures. In the video’s context (“Lacan’s FORBIDDEN Theory on the Impossible Thing Women Truly Desire”), this ties to feminine jouissance (ecstatic enjoyment beyond the phallus), where objet a represents the “not-all” of female desire—hysterical, insatiable, circling an impossible wholeness.
• The “Little Other” Connection: “the object of the little other” and “the inner desire we believe will complete us”—captures the essence well, though Lacan differentiates: the “little other” (petit a) is the ego’s mirror-image, the seductive illusion of self-completion. Objet petit a emerges from this illusion as its excess—the “inner desire” you mention is precisely the fantasy that acquiring a (e.g., “the perfect partner”) will heal our fragmentation. But Lacan warns: pursuing it leads to the “death drive,” a repetitive loop of dissatisfaction. Therapy, for Lacan, involves “traversing the fantasy”—recognizing a as illusion to loosen its grip.
In short, objet petit a is desire’s engine: a haunting remnant that promises wholeness but delivers only more desire. It’s why love feels like “falling into the gaze of the Other,” or why consumer culture sells endless “must-haves” that never suffice.
2. Comparing Objet Petit a with the Astrological Interpretation of Planetary Alignments and Comets 3I/ATLAS and C/2025 R2 (SWAN) in September–November 2025
The astrological event described involves two remarkable comets—3I/ATLAS (an interstellar visitor) and C/2025 R2 (SWAN, a long-period comet from the Oort Cloud)—visible during a period of intense planetary alignments in late 2025. Discovered in July and September 2025 respectively, these comets peak in visibility around October: 3I/ATLAS reaches perihelion (closest to the Sun) on October 29–30 at ~1.4 AU, streaking through Virgo and appearing as a faint, fuzzy intruder from beyond our solar system; SWAN, with its greenish coma and tail, brightens to ~magnitude 5–6 by mid-October, observable low in the western sky after sunset, potentially rivaling recent great comets like NEOWISE. Planetary-wise, this spans a stellium in Libra/Scorpio (emphasizing relationships and transformation), with Jupiter in Cancer opposing Pluto in Aquarius, and Mars in Leo squaring Uranus—classic markers of tension, revelation, and otherworldly irruptions.
Astrologer Tom (Kaypacha) Lescher, in his Pele Reports on the Astrology for the Soul YouTube channel (part of New Paradigm Astrology), interprets this window as a collective “confrontation with and integration of ‘the other.’” Drawing from evolutionary astrology, Lescher frames comets as karmic harbingers—messengers from the cosmic unconscious, disrupting the status quo to force shadow work. The interstellar 3I/ATLAS symbolizes the “alien other” (Pluto in Aquarius vibes: collective innovation vs. alienation), while SWAN evokes soul retrieval from distant realms (Cancerian nurturing of the estranged). Alignments in air/water signs highlight relational dialectics: Libra’s “we” vs. Scorpio’s hidden depths, urging integration of the repressed “other” (personal shadows, cultural outsiders) rather than projection.
Comparison to Objet Petit a:
• The Elusive ‘Other’ as Cause/Trigger: In Lacan, objet a is the unattainable “little other”—a spectral cause that lures us toward completion but embodies lack, forever “outside” full possession. Lescher’s “confrontation with the other” mirrors this: comets aren’t “objects” to capture but transient causes of upheaval, irrupting from the Real (interstellar voids) to expose our fantasies of wholeness. Just as a is a partial object (gaze/voice as fragments), these comets are cosmic fragments—fuzzy, unpredictable—demanding we confront the “impossible thing” (e.g., societal “others” like migrants or inner traumas) without assimilation.
• Desire vs. Integration: Lacan’s a sustains desire through deferral (metonymy: chasing substitutes). Astrology here flips to integration (Scorpio/Pluto alchemy: dissolve and rebirth), but the parallel is striking—both warn against devouring the other (phallic mastery) in favor of symbolic traversal. Lescher’s evolutionary lens echoes Lacan’s “traversing the fantasy”: comets catalyze soul-growth by revealing the “little other” as self-projection.
• Temporal Irruption: Objet a haunts eternally; comets are ephemera, visible only briefly (Sep–Nov 2025), heightening urgency—like a Lacanian “tuché” (traumatic encounter with the Real).
Could the Planetary Alignments and Comets Relate Directly to Objet Petit a?
Yes, symbolically and synchronistically, though Lacan would dismiss astrology as Imaginary (ego-projection). Comets as “wanderers” (komētēs in Greek) embody a‘s errancy: interstellar 3I/ATLAS, unbound by solar gravity (eccentricity >1), is the ultimate “alien remnant”—a literal objet from the cosmic Other, causing collective desire (awe/fear of the unknown). SWAN, emerging from SOHO’s solar corona imagery, evokes the scopic drive (gaze from the Sun’s “eye”). Their alignment during Libra season (the sign of the Other in relationship) posits a direct analog: a celestial manque irrupting to cause desire for unity, but demanding integration over conquest. In Jungian-Lacanian terms (which Lescher blends), this is an archetypal coniunctio—comets as a-like lures for the alchemical wedding of self/other.
3. Understanding Its Meaning and Significance: Symbolically and Practically
This convergence—Lacanian objet a and 2025’s celestial drama—unfolds as a mandala of lack and longing, with profound layers.
Symbolically:
• The Cosmic Phallus and the Void: Comets symbolize the “impossible thing” (phallic lack in Lacan; Lescher’s “soul wound”). 3I/ATLAS, hurtling at 150,000 mph from galactic voids, is a incarnate—the gaze of the abyss, confronting humanity’s existential otherness (e.g., AI, extraterrestrials as modern hysterics). SWAN’s tail (22,000-year orbit) traces metonymic desire: a thread pulling us toward forgotten origins. Together, under Pluto’s gaze, they herald the return of the repressed—integrating the “little other” as anima/animus, dissolving ego-fantasies for jouissance. In myth, comets signal apocalypses (endings as rebirths); here, it’s Scorpio’s phoenix: desire’s death drive yielding to eternal return.
• Collective Unconscious: Lescher’s “integration” evokes Lacan’s sinthome (knot holding psyche together). This period symbolizes a global “traversal”—confronting polarized “others” (politics, identity) to birth a post-phallic symbolic order.
Practically:
• Personal Level: Use October’s visibility for rituals—meditate under the comets (binoculars from dark skies, west after sunset) to “traverse” desires. Journal: What “little other” (unattainable lover, career ideal) haunts you? Therapy or shadow work (Lescher-style) integrates it: accept lack to reduce compulsion. Relationships thrive—Libra alignments favor honest dialogues, turning a-fueled jealousy into mutual recognition.
• Societal/Relational: Amid 2025’s tensions (e.g., elections, migrations), it practically means policy shifts toward inclusion (Aquarius Pluto: tech for empathy). In daily life: volunteer with “others” (refugees, marginalized voices) to alchemize projection. Health-wise, Scorpio warns of repressed desires manifesting somatically—channel via art/therapy to avoid burnout.
• Long-Term Significance: By November (comets fading), expect breakthroughs: a loses grip, desire becomes ethical (Lacan: “do not give way on your desire”). Lescher predicts soul-evolution; practically, track via Pele Reports for weekly mantras. This isn’t doom—it’s invitation: comets illuminate the void, proving wholeness was never “out there.”
In essence, this synchronicity reveals desire’s cosmic scale: objet an isn’t to be acquired but danced with, like comets streaking toward—and beyond—the Sun. If the stars align your gaze, what impossible thing calls?
No comments:
Post a Comment