The Weaver
Plot Summary
Her rise in prestige depends on creating drama to attract attention. She elevates herself by undermining others, positioning her target as a villain while presenting herself as a victim to a loyal audience that accepts her narrative without question.
The person she targets has the right to defend themselves against her accusations. However, she has strategically framed the situation so that any attempt to expose her manipulation is portrayed as proof of obsession. This leaves her target with two choices: continue defending themselves, further reinforcing her narrative, or remain silent and allow her version of events to take hold, repeated so often that it is accepted as truth by those who fail to question it.
This is one of the dangers of enabling narcissistic behavior within our community.
The Weaver
The writing community thrived on social media, a delicate ecosystem of fragile egos, mutual validation, and an unspoken hierarchy where prestige was currency. Sal had mastered the game. Her rise wasn’t about skill—her work was derivative, her prose forgettable. But she understood something more valuable than craft: drama. Drama got attention, and attention conferred status.
She built her reputation not on talent but on the ability to manipulate perception. To her adoring followers—aspiring writers desperate for recognition—she was a beacon of empowerment, a sharp-witted truth-teller exposing the industry’s secret injustices. The fact that she was the injustice went unnoticed.
Her latest target was David. He had once been an ally, but when he critiqued her latest self-indulgent essay—gently, but publicly—he became an enemy.
___________
Sal did what she did best. She didn’t argue back directly. That would imply a fair debate. Instead, she crafted a narrative. She framed David’s critique as an attack, twisting his words to suggest insidious motives.
“He’s been obsessed with me for months,” she posted. “I didn’t want to say anything, but this is harassment. Some men just can’t stand to see a woman succeed.”
Her devoted audience did what they always did. They amplified her words, flooding David’s mentions with disgust, shaking their heads at yet another bitter, mediocre man trying to silence a woman.
David woke to find himself cast as the villain in a story he hadn’t even realized he was in.
___________
At first, he thought he could reason with them. He posted screenshots, pointing out how she had misrepresented him. He explained, clearly and calmly, that disagreement was not harassment.
Sal only needed two words to dismantle his entire defense:
“See? Obsessive.”
And that was all it took. His attempt to clear his name became evidence against him. The more he defended himself, the more she framed it as proof of her own victimhood.
“I just want to move on,” she lamented to her audience. “But he won’t let me.”
The community rallied around her. They blocked David. They mocked him in sub-tweets. His name became shorthand for “problematic.” Agents he’d been querying stopped responding. His writing group grew distant.
The world was moving on without him.
___________
David had two choices:
Keep fighting, keep screaming the truth into the void, knowing that every response would only serve as more “proof” of his guilt.
Stay silent and let Sal’s version of reality become the reality.
Neither was a victory.
Sal, meanwhile, flourished. Her following grew. She was invited onto a panel about “Navigating Harassment in the Writing Community.” She laughed about the “obsessive ex-fan” in podcasts. She secured a book deal—nothing groundbreaking, but enough to cement her position.
David deleted his account.
___________
Months passed. Sal moved on to new targets, weaving new narratives. But a whisper ran through the community. A handful of people—quiet, observant—had watched the pattern repeat too many times. They started asking questions.
One day, someone else fought back, but differently. They didn’t defend themselves publicly, didn’t engage with her framing. Instead, they exposed the pattern, detached from emotion. They let others draw the conclusions.
The whispers grew.
Sal’s next campaign faltered. For the first time, people hesitated before amplifying her words. They had seen too many “obsessive” men, too many supposed harassers, all with the same story.
One day, a new name trended. It wasn’t her target’s.
It was hers.
No comments:
Post a Comment